* * *
When Arthur captures and kills a king after he refuses to sign a treaty, the grieving queen swears vengeance upon Arthur Pendragon. She employs the witch Morgana to help her win the coming war, but Arthur wants to find another solution. He challenges her to single combat. each side will choose a champion to fight. The stakes? Half of Camelot free of charge if the opposition wins, and the agressors leave peacefully and hand back Camelot's land to Arthur if his side wins. But with Morgana working against them too, can the young king, secretly aided by Merlin, prevail and win the day?
* * *
This story is a fairly good one, though not as good as last week's 'Aithusa'. Again, we see Morgana getting mixed in with who are supposedly the villains. To be honest, I've seen enough of Morgana for the next few episodes. We see too much of her for too brief a time each episode. It annoys me a bit.
Anyhow. The story.
The idea of a greiving queen making a fairly emotional decision to make war upon Camelot (or rather advance it further) is a good one - one that seems fairly plausible.
Again we see Agravaine not-so-subtly influencing Arthur. It's getting to me that Arthur doesn't see that he's using his position to promote his own views. How he doesn't see that his uncle isn't all that he seems and that he has his own agenda defeats me. After all, when Agravaine practically orders him to deliver an ultimatum to the captured king, Arthur doesn't so much as ask why, he just goes along with it, has a scroll written out for him and hands it over. Then he kills the guy. Honestly though, such mind-numbing ignorance is thoroughly depressing. What do the BBC think we can swallow?
We also don't get enough of Merlin himself. There aren't many scenes with him in it properly as such, more as a sort of background character who occasionally proves useful. Degrading a core character, in fact THE main character, to a side-show just isn't on. It's about Merlin and Arthur, not Arthur and Merlin, for The Great Dragon's sake. If it's about Merlin then have more Merlin! You make a salty food with a hint of spice, you add salt and little spice, not lots of spice and little salt. Idiots.
However, we do get a pretty cool battle scene at the end, in which Merlin plays a rather minor role which, needless to say, goes further to annoy me. But that's it.
But I like the ending. What with the queen giving her speech of honour sort of thing to Arthur, she comes across as kind of hopeful, grieving still, but content. She sort of seems to see goodness in Arthur. Then again, he is destined to be the greatest king of all, so he would be kind of like that.
* * *
I'll give this episode a six out of ten. Not enough Merlin, but let's be frank, some series are like that: They generally focus on one person throughout, but go out of there way to make other slightly more minor characters more exciting and have a depth to them that you didn't see before. Then there's the slight lack of magic here. There's a curse and some countering. That's it. Bah!
The story was a nice thing though. It left me smiling simply because of the end five minutes, which ended it really well. Which I think will make me raise the episode's rating to six and a half.
See this episode of Merlin here! http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b016x0qh/Merlin_Series_4_His_Fathers_Son/
No comments:
Post a Comment